4.6 Article

Reactive extraction and recovery of mono-caffeoylquinic acids from tobacco wastes by trialkylphosphine oxide

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 53-62

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.05.003

Keywords

Extraction; Isothermal; Mono-caffeoylquinic acids (mono-CQAs); Selectivity; Separation; Tobacco (Nicotiana tobaccum L.) waste

Funding

  1. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB724700]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20876076]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2009213]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M510124]
  6. Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2010419]
  7. Jiangsu University of Science and Technology [35211002, 33201002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The feasibility of reactive extraction of mono-caffeoylquinic acids (mono-CQAs) from aqueous extract solutions of tobacco wastes was studied. The mixed solvent system, initial pH, extractant concentration, complexation stoichiometry, equilibrium and mechanism were discussed. The results indicated that the extraction ability of extractants decreases in the order trialkylphosphine oxide (TRPO) > N235 approximate to tributylphosphate (TBP) > trioctyl phosphate (TOP). Using a 1:1 ratio of 20% TRPO/kerosene to sample volume, one step recovered 94.9% of the mono-CQAs from an aqueous solution at pH 3. The complexation stoichiometry between TRPO and the mono-CQAs was 1:2 or 1:3, but the formation of 1:2 complexes was favored. The extraction equilibrium of the mono-CQAs was fit to a Henry isotherm, and the process was exothermic. Hydrogen-bond interactions between TRPO and mono-CQAs were confirmed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra, and the changes in the wavenumbers of absorbances increased with decreasing pK(a) values of the mono-CQAs. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available