4.6 Article

Robust multi-objective optimal control of uncertain (bio)chemical processes

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 66, Issue 20, Pages 4670-4682

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2011.06.018

Keywords

(Bio)chemical reactors; Dynamic optimization; Optimal control; Multi-objective optimization; Robust optimization; Uncertainty

Funding

  1. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven [OT/10/035, PFV/10/002, KP/09/005, GOA/10/09, GOA/10/01]
  2. FWO [G.0320.08, G.0558.08, G.0377.09]
  3. EU
  4. Belgian Program on Interuniversity Poles of Attraction
  5. Belgian chemistry and life sciences federation essenscia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic optimization or optimal control problems are omnipresent in the (bio) chemical industry. In addition, these problems often involve multiple and conflicting objectives, leading to a so-called set of Pareto optimal solutions, instead of one single optimum. Alternatively, robustness of the obtained solutions with respect to model uncertainties, e.g., guaranteeing that critical constraints are not violated, is of the highest importance in process industry. Moreover, robustness can also be interpreted as an additional and conflicting objective, since more robust solutions typically induce a performance decrease. The current manuscript exploits advanced deterministic techniques to efficiently and accurately generate Pareto sets in the presence of model uncertainty. The developed procedures allow the presentation of robust Pareto sets, i.e., Pareto sets in which robustness is an additional objective. Based on these Pareto sets, all trade-offs can clearly be assessed by the decision maker. Two illustrative case studies are presented for the optimal design and operation of a jacketed tubular reactor with conflicting conversion and energy objectives and a fed-batch bioreactor with conflicting productivity and yield aims. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available