4.6 Article

Mixed micelles of binary surfactant mixtures Tween 40-Na-3,12-dioxo-5β-cholanate and Tween 80-Na-3,12-dioxo-5β-cholanate and their thermodynamic description and characterization

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages 2826-2839

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2014.05.022

Keywords

Regular solution theory; Excess Gibbs energy; Tween 40 and 80; Bile salts

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [172021]
  2. Provincial Secretariat for Science and Technological Development, AP Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia [114-451-2113/2014-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regular solution theory (RST) was compared with model-independent thermodynamical methods (MIM) to analyze binary mixed micelles. It was found that if the molar fractions of the surfactants obtained using RST and MIM do not differ, the binary mixed micelles are symmetrical, according to the excess Gibbs energy. The algorithm used to analyze the binary surfactant mixtures, i.e., the method for determining whether the binary mixture of the surfactants is symmetrical and obeys RST, was developed. Binary mixtures of Threen 40 - Na-3,12-dioxo-5 beta-cholanate (T40-3,12-DOC) and Tween 80 - Na-3,12-dioxo-5 beta-cholanate (T80-3,12-DOC) were analyzed. Mixed micelles of T40-3,12-DOC were found to be more stable compared with the hypothetical ideal mixed micelles, i.e., they are primarily symmetrical, according to the excess Gibbs energy, but they do not obey RST. Mixed micelles of T80-3,12-DOC were non-symmetrical, according to the excess free energy, and were less stable then the ideal mixed micelles. With the increase in the molar fraction of T80 in the mixed micelle, the micelle became less stable and decomposed into micelles that comprised the building units. (C) 2014 The Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available