4.7 Article

Electrochromic titania nanotube arrays for the enhanced photocatalytic degradation of phenol and pharmaceutical compounds

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 249, Issue -, Pages 285-292

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.111

Keywords

Cathodisation; Titania nanotube arrays; Electrochromism; Photocatalysis; Phenol; Pharmaceutical compounds

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MEST) [2012R1A2A2A01006581, 2013062394]
  2. Korean Ministry of Environment as The Converging Technology Project [2012000600002]
  3. KIST-UNIST partnership program [2.130404.01]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A2A01006581] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vertically aligned, electrochromic-coloured, amorphous titania nanotube arrays (TNAs) were fabricated using a facile room-temperature, solution-based electrochemical cathodisation method. Rapid cathodisation within 30s converted pristine TNAs into their dark analogues. Compared to their untreated counterparts, the cathodised dark TNAs exhibited significantly enhanced optical absorbance, covering the full spectrum of visible light. Further annealing of the electrochromic coloured amorphous TNAs in a N-2 atmosphere induced their transformation into dark crystalline TNAs, which directly harnessed simulated sunlight for the photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants, including phenol, ibuprofen, carbamazepine and caffeine. Compared to the pristine crystalline TNAs (annealed in air), the dark crystalline TNAs showed higher optical absorbance, larger charge carrier density, lower electron transport resistance, and an enhancement of 107-131% in degradation kinetics for the target organic contaminants. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available