4.7 Article

Calcium and hydrogen effects during sorption of copper onto an alginate-based ion exchanger: Batch and fixed-bed column studies

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 232, Issue -, Pages 51-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.07.079

Keywords

Calcium competition; Copper sorption; Fixed-bed column; Hydrogen alginate; Regeneration

Funding

  1. Korea Ministry of Environment as The Eco-Innovation Program [2012001340002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The characteristics of alginate beads in calcium (Ca2+) and hydrogen (H+) form were studied with respect to the uptake of copper ions (Cu2+) via batch and fixed-bed column experiments. The maximum Cu2+ sorption capacities (Q(max)) of calcium and hydrogen alginates (abbreviated as CA and HA, respectively) were found to be 107 mg/g and 189 mg/g, respectively. At pH 5, more than 95% of Cu2+ was removed, but the amount of Cu2+ sorbed onto CA beads was significantly lowered at pH 2 owing to the pKa value of carboxylic acid. When Ca2+, as a competing ion, was present in solution at a molar ratio of Ca2+ to Cu2+ equal to 8, Q(max) was drastically decreased to 20 mg/g. A faster equilibrium time (24 h) was also observed for HA beads compared to CA beads (48 h). In a fixed-bed column packed with CA beads, the break-through of Cu2+ occurred immediately with the presence of Case in the model wastewater. Using HA beads, however, the first breakthrough of Cu2+ appeared after 900 bed volumes. These results suggested that HA beads were more effective than CA beads in reducing the adverse influence of competing cations such as Ca2+ during the initial period of Cu2+ sorption. Moreover, the breakthrough of CO occurred later than that of Ca2+ due to a higher selectivity of Cu2+ over Ca2+, which was confirmed by a separation factor (proportional to(Cu/Ca), 10.3) of HA beads. In addition, their reusability was confirmed via ten regeneration cycles. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available