4.7 Article

Electrochemical reactivation of granular activated carbon: Impact of reactor configuration

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 197, Issue -, Pages 414-423

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.05.049

Keywords

Activated carbon; Electrochemical; Regeneration; Reactivation; GAC; Phenol; Reactor

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main objective of this paper was to compare different electrochemical reactor configurations for the reactivation of granular activated carbon (GAC). Laboratory experiments were conducted using phenol as adsorbate: three different GACs as adsorbents; and four different reactor configurations (divided-cell batch reactor, undivided-cell batch reactor, stainless steel column type reactor, and a simple batch reactor). The undivided-cell and divided-cell batch reactors were slightly more efficient than the simple batch reactor. The divided-cell reactor had slightly higher efficiencies than the undivided reactor, however, it had a number of disadvantages that countered the slightly better performance. The stainless steel column reactivation reactor did not perform as well as the batch reactors with a single layer of GAC particles, possibly due to the lower fraction of the GAC particles in direct contact with the cathode. However, the stainless steel column reactivation reactor performance was slightly better than the batch reactors with multi-layer of GAC. Reactivation of different numbers of layers of GAC particles showed a significant decrease in the reactivation efficiency with increasing number of the GAC layers demonstrating the benefit for closer contact between the GAC particles and the electrode. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available