Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned
Authors
Keywords
patient-centered outcomes research, comparative effectiveness research (CER), patient engagement
Journal
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 13-21
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2015-07-10
DOI
10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute
- (2015) Lori Frank et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research
- (2015) Laura P Forsythe et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice
- (2015) Laura Esmail et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Patient engagement in research: a systematic review
- (2014) Juan Pablo Domecq et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- (2014) Lori Frank et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
- (2014) Thomas W. Concannon et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- A Systematic Review of Approaches for Engaging Patients for Research on Rare Diseases
- (2014) Laura P. Forsythe et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- The Art of Age-Appropriate Care
- (2013) Lorna A. Fern et al. CANCER NURSING
- Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: a US research perspective
- (2013) Thomas Workman et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
- (2012) Jo Brett et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Continuous Patient Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness Research
- (2012) Abdulla M. Abdulhalim JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples
- (2012) Jonathan Boote et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement
- (2012) Patricia A Deverka et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- THE JAMES LIND ALLIANCE APPROACH TO PRIORITY SETTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH: AN INTEGRATIVE METHODOLOGY BASED ON PATIENT AND CLINICIAN PARTICIPATION
- (2011) Artitaya Lophatananon et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy
- (2011) Vanessa Edwards et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research
- (2011) Sophie Staniszewska et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: a narrative review of case examples
- (2011) Jonathan Boote et al. Trials
- Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities
- (2010) Ruth J. Stewart et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
- (2009) Craig Mitton et al. HEALTH POLICY
- AHRQ Series Paper 3: Identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care program
- (2009) Evelyn P. Whitlock et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Practice-based Research is Community Engagement
- (2009) J. M. Westfall et al. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started