4.6 Article

Functional Connectivity and Brain Activation: A Synergistic Approach

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 2619-2629

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht119

Keywords

attention; FCD; fMRI; hub; performance

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism [2RO1AA09481]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies exploit endogenous brain activity for mapping brain activation during periodic cognitive/emotional challenges or brain functional connectivity during the resting state. Previous studies demonstrated that these approaches provide a limited view of brain function which can be complemented by each other. We hypothesized that graph theory functional connectivity density (FCD) mapping would demonstrate regional FCD decreases between resting-state scan and a continuous task-state scan. Forty-five healthy volunteers underwent functional connectivity MRI during resting-state as well as a continuous visual attention task, and standard fMRI with a blocked version of the visual attention task. High-resolution data-driven FCD mapping was used to measure task-related connectivity changes without a priori hypotheses. Results demonstrate that task performance was associated with FCD decreases in brain regions weakly activated/deactivated by the task. Furthermore, a pronounced negative correlation between blood oxygen level-dependent-fMRI activation and task-related FCD decreases emerged across brain regions that also suggest the disconnection of task-irrelevant networks during task performance. The correlation between improved accuracy and stronger FCD decreases further suggests the disconnection of task-irrelevant networks during task performance. Functional connectivity can potentiate traditional fMRI studies and offer a more complete picture of brain function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available