4.7 Article

TPR-TPD-TPO studies on CGO/NiO and CGO/CuO ceramics obtained from freeze-dried precursors

Journal

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 15175-15182

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.132

Keywords

Ceria; NiO; CuO; Freeze drying; SOFC

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [MAT2007-60127, MAT2010-16007]
  2. FEDER funds
  3. EPSRC
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J016454/1, EP/G012865/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/J016454/1, EP/G012865/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanocrystalline powders of Ce0.99Gd0.01O2-delta have been obtained at a very low temperature (400 degrees C) by a freeze-drying precursor method. Afterwards, ethanol solution of Ni or Cu nitrates were added to gadolinia doped ceria (CGO) by incipient wetness impregnation and then calcined in air at 650 degrees C in order to obtain CGO/NiO and CGO/CuO series of SOFC anode materials The resulting materials were characterized by X-ray Diffraction, N-2 adsorption-desorption (BET), Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR), Temperature Programmed Desorption (TPD) and Temperature Programmed Oxidation (TPO) techniques. TPR showed wide overlapped peaks which are associated to the different reduction stages; firstly the reduction of highly dispersed metal oxide species took place and then the metal oxide bulk reduction process. After reduction of the CGO-metal powders, the metallic oxides were no longer present (as indicated by the presence of Ni or Cu), and the fluorite CGO solid solution remained stable. He-TPD tests showed that the series CGO/NiO adsorbed CO species on the material surface while CGO/CuO did not. O-2-TPO analysis showed that C deposition occurred during the CO-TPR on CGO/NiO samples but this did not occur for the CGO/CuO series. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and Techna Group S.r.l. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available