4.4 Article

Headache yesterday in China: A new approach to estimating the burden of headache, applied in a general-population survey in China

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 33, Issue 15, Pages 1211-1217

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102413490347

Keywords

China; headache yesterday; burden of illness; disability; Global Campaign against Headache

Funding

  1. Lifting The Burden, The Global Campaign against Headache
  2. World Health Organization
  3. headache NGOs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In order to minimize recall bias in burden estimation, questions about headache yesterday were included in a population-based survey initiated by Lifting The Burden: The Global Campaign against Headache. Methods Throughout China, nonrelated respondents aged 18-65 years were randomly sampled from the general population by a door-to-door survey. A validated structured questionnaire included inquiry into occurrence and burden of headache on the preceding day (headache yesterday). Results The participation rate was 94.1%. Of 5041 participants, 286 (5.7%) (male 3.6%, female 7.9%) reported headache yesterday. Age-weighted prevalence of headache yesterday was 4.8% (male 3.0%, female 6.6%). Headache yesterday lasted all day in 36.8%, <1 hour in 14.3% and for a mean of 3.73.3 hours in 48.9%. Headache yesterday was moderate to severe in 79.9%; disability such that they could do less than half of what they had expected was reported by 19.9% and such that they could do nothing by a further 7.5% (total 27.4%). Almost three-quarters (71.5%) with headache yesterday took medication to treat it. Conclusions Of the adult Chinese population, 1.8% have headache at any one time that is of moderate to severe intensity in 1.4%, and 1.3% lose the equivalent of a whole day to headache-attributed disability every day. In China this means 12.3 million people.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available