4.5 Article

Effect of Valproate, Lamotrigine and Levetiracetam on Excitability and Firing Properties of CA1 Neurons in Rat Brain Slices

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages 645-652

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-011-9660-y

Keywords

Epilepsy; Brain slice; CA1 cells; Patch clamp; Sodium channel

Funding

  1. Karolinska Institutets Fonder
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to analyze the rapid effects of the antiepileptic drugs valproate, lamotrigine, and levetiracetam on excitability and firing properties of hippocampal neurons. The drug effects on resting potential, action potential, and repetitive firing properties were studied in whole-cell current-clamp recordings of CA1 neurons in rat brain slices. Lamotrigine changed action potential rising slope by -24 +/- A 38 V/s (mean +/- A SD), peak amplitude by -6.8 +/- A 5.0 mV, and maximum firing frequency by -60 +/- A 13%. Lamotrigine thereto increased the voltage threshold by 4.3 +/- A 4.2 mV and augmented the action potential attenuation during repetitive firing. All effects were significant (P < 0.01 to P < 0.0002) compared to control cells. Valproate and levetiracetam showed no significant effects on these parameters. None of the tested drugs had a significant effect on the resting potential. The lamotrigine effects are consistent with sodium channel blocking which may explain or contribute to the antiepileptic mode of action. Valproate and levetiracetam did not show these effects and the mechanism of their antiepileptic action need to be different. These findings (valproate) differ in some respects from findings reported in cultured or dissociated neurons. In a slice where the neurons have largely preserved connections, drug effects are likely to be more similar to the therapeutic action in the brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available