4.5 Article

Dual Neuroprotective and Neurotoxic Effects of Cannabinoid Drugs in Vitro

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 195-202

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10571-010-9604-y

Keywords

Cannabinoid; Neuroprotective; Neurotoxic; N18TG2; Cannabinoid receptors

Funding

  1. Israel Anti-Drug Authority

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Either protective or toxic effects of cannabinoids on cell survival have been reported extensively in the literature; however, the factors that determine the direction of the effect are still obscured. In this study we have used the neuroblastoma cell line N18TG2 that expresses CB1 cannabinoid receptors to investigate several factors that may determine the consequences of exposure to cannabinoid agonists. Cells that were grown under optimal, stressful, or differentiating conditions were exposed to cannabinoid agonists and then assayed for cell viability by measuring MTT, LDH, and caspase-3 activity. Various cannabinoid agonists (CP 55,940, a dagger 9-THC, HU-210, and WIN 55,212-2) failed to affect cell viability when the cells were grown under optimal conditions. On the other hand, the same agonists significantly reduced cell viability when the cells were grown under stressful conditions (glucose- and serum-free medium), while enhancing the viability of cells grown in differentiation medium (0.5% serum and 1.5% DMSO). The toxic/protective profile was not dependent on the type or the concentration of the cannabinoid agonist that was applied. The cannabinoid agonist CP 55,940 similarly affected the non-neuronal HEK-293 cells that were grown under stressful conditions only when they expressed CB1 receptors. Our results shed light on the conflicting reports regarding the protective or toxic effects of cannabinoids in vitro and indicate that cannabinoids may activate different intracellular signaling mechanisms, depending on the state of the cell, thus leading to different physiological consequences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available