4.4 Review

Paracrine Effects and Heterogeneity of Marrow-Derived Stem/Progenitor Cells: Relevance for the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases

Journal

CELLS TISSUES ORGANS
Volume 197, Issue 6, Pages 445-473

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000348831

Keywords

Acute lung injury; Asthma; Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; Cystic fibrosis; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Endothelial progenitor cells; Fibrocytes; Mesenchymal stromal cells; Pulmonary hypertension

Funding

  1. Italian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
  2. FFC [2/2006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cell-based treatment may represent a hope for the treatment of acute lung injury and pulmonary fibrosis, and other chronic lung diseases, such as cystic fibrosis, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It is well established in preclinical models that bone marrow-derived stem and progenitor cells exert beneficial effects on inflammation, immune responses and repairing of damage in virtually all lung-borne diseases. While it was initially thought that the positive outcome was due to a direct engraftment of these cells into the lung as endothelial and epithelial cells, paracrine factors are now considered the main mechanism through which stem and progenitor cells exert their therapeutic effect. This knowledge has led to the clinical use of marrow cells in pulmonary hypertension with endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and in COPD with mesenchymal stromal (stem) cells (MSCs). Bone marrow-derived stem cells, including hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, MSCs, EPCs and fibrocytes, encompass a wide array of cell subsets with different capacities of engraftment and injured tissue-regenerating potential. The characterization/isolation of the stem cell subpopulations represents a major challenge to improve the efficacy of transplantation protocols used in regenerative medicine and applied to lung disorders. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available