4.5 Article

Alternatively Expressed Genes Identified in the CD4(+) T Cells of Allograft Rejection Mice

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 333-350

Publisher

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096368910X552844

Keywords

Allograft rejection; Gene expression profile; Genomics; Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE); CD4(+) T cells; SCID mouse

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [C030471639]
  2. Shandong University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allograft rejection is a leading cause for the failure of allotransplantation. CD4(+) T cells play critical roles in this process. The identification of genes hat alternatively expressed in CD4(+) T cells during allograft rejection will provide critical information for studying the mechanism of allograft rejection, finding specific gene markers for monitoring, predicting allograft rejection, and opening new ways to regulate and prevent allograft rejection. Here, we established allograft and isograft transplantation models by adoptively transferring wild-type BALB/c mouse CD4(+) T cells into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice with a C57BL/6 or BALB/c mouse skin graft. Using the whole transcriptome sequencing-based serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) technology, we identified 97 increasingly and 88 decreasingly expressed genes that may play important roles in allograft rejection and tolerance. Functional classification of these genes shows that apoptosis, transcription regulation, cell growth and maintenance, and signal transduction are among the frequently changed functional groups. This study provides a genome-wide view for the candidate genes of CD4(+) T cells related to allotransplantation, and this report is a good resource for further microarray studies and for identifying the specific markers that are associated with clinical organ transplantations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available