4.7 Article

Mesenchymal differentiation propensity of a human embryonic stem cell line

Journal

CELL PROLIFERATION
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 120-127

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2011.00744.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Nuffield Foundation
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. MRC [G108/620] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Medical Research Council [G108/620] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To characterize basal differentiation tendencies of a human embryonic stem (hES) cell line, KCL-002. Materials and methods: In vitro specification and differentiation of hES cells were carried out using embryoid body (EB) cultures and tests of pluripotency and in vivo differentiation were performed by teratoma assays in SCID mice. Real-time PCR, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry and histological analyses were used to identify expression of genes and proteins associated with the ectodermal, endodermal and mesodermal germ layers. Results: Undifferentiated KCL-002 cells expressed characteristic markers of pluripotent stem cells such as Nanog, Sox-2, Oct-4 and TRA 1-60. When differentiated in vitro as EB cultures, expression of pluripotency, endodermal and ectodermal markers decreased rapidly. In contrast, mesodermal and mesenchymal markers such as VEGFR-2, alpha-actin and vimentin increased during EB differentiation as shown by qPCR, immunostaining and flow cytometric analyses. Teratoma formation in SCID mice demonstrated the potential to form all germ layers in vivo with a greater proportion of the tumours containing mesenchymal derivatives. Conclusions: The data presented suggest that the KCL-002 hES cell line is pluripotent and harbours a bias in basal differentiation tendencies towards mesodermal and mesenchymal lineage cells. Characterizing innate differentiation propensities of hES cell lines is important for understanding heterogeneity between different cell lines and for further studies aimed at deriving specific lineages from hES cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available