4.3 Article

Metabolic Alterations During the Growth of Tumour Spheroids

Journal

CELL BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages 615-628

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9757-7

Keywords

Tumour metabolism; Solid tumour models; Warburg hypothesis; Glycolytic metabolism; Tumour growth; Tumour acidification; Metabolic adaptation

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/I017909/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/I017909/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid tumours undergo considerable alterations in their metabolism of nutrients in order to generate sufficient energy and biomass for sustained growth and proliferation. During growth, the tumour microenvironment exerts a number of influences (e.g. hypoxia and acidity) that affect cellular biology and the flux or utilisation of fuels including glucose. The tumour spheroid model was used to characterise the utilisation of glucose and describe alterations to the activity and expression of key glycolytic enzymes during the tissue growth curve. Glucose was avidly consumed and associated with the production of lactate and an acidified medium, confirming the reliance on glycolytic pathways and a diminution of oxidative phosphorylation. The expression levels and activities of hexokinase, phosphofructokinase-1, pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase in the glycolytic pathway were measured to assess glycolytic capacity. Similar measurements were made for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the entry point and regulatory step of the pentose-phosphate pathway (PPP) and for cytosolic malate dehydrogenase, a key link to TCA cycle intermediates. The parameters for these key enzymes were shown to undergo considerable variation during the growth curve of tumour spheroids. In addition, they revealed that the dynamic alterations were influenced by both transcriptional and posttranslational mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available