4.3 Article

Frequency and Risk of Noncardiac Surgery After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Journal

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 77, Issue 7, Pages 972-976

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22744

Keywords

drug-eluting stent; perioperative risk; noncardiac surgery; clopidogrel

Funding

  1. Boston Scientific
  2. Abbott Vascular
  3. Medicure
  4. Medtronic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Few studies have described the frequency and risk of surgery after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. Methods: The medical records of 827 consecutive patients who received a DES at our institution between January 1, 2005 and July 1, 2008 were retrospectively reviewed to determine the outcomes of patients who subsequently underwent noncardiac surgery. Results: During a median follow-up of 21 months, 135 patients underwent 191 noncardiac surgeries. The incidence of noncardiac surgery was 7% at 1 year, 18% at 2 years, and 22% at 3 years. Mean age was 62 years and 96% were men. A perioperative complication occurred in 19 surgeries (10%): excessive bleeding in 11 patients (6%), myocardial infarction in four patients (2%), acute renal failure in one patient (0.5%), hypotension and syncope in one patient (0.5%) and postoperative death in three patients (1.6%). Stent thrombosis occurred in one patient (0.5%). A complication occurred in six of 58 surgeries (10%) in which patients received perioperative clopidogrel vs. 13 of 133 surgeries (10%) in which patients did not receive perioperative clopidogrel (P = 0.90). Complications occurred in three of 25 surgeries performed within 6 months (16%), in four of 37 surgeries performed between 6 and 12 months (11%), and in 12 of 129 surgeries performed after > 12 months (9%) from DES implantation (P 5 0.90). Conclusion: Noncardiac surgery is frequently needed in the years after DES implantation and appears to carry a low risk of stent thrombosis and perioperative complications. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available