4.7 Article

Vegetation strategies for soil water consumption along a pluviometric gradient in southern Spain

Journal

CATENA
Volume 84, Issue 1-2, Pages 12-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2010.08.011

Keywords

Pluviometric gradient; Soil water content; Water availability; Vegetation cover; Wilting point

Funding

  1. Agencia Andaluza del Agua
  2. III Plan Andaluz de Investigacion (Regional Government of Andalucia)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Changes in vegetation and soil hydrological resources occur in southern Spain because of the presence of a pluviometric gradient from west (1100 mm year(-1)) to east (240 mm year(-1)). Five hillslopes under different rainfall regimes were selected along this gradient and studied over a 4-year period. The objectives of the work were to analyze variation in soil moisture, water availability for plants, and drying processes on the hillslopes, and relationships between these factors and the annual variability of vegetation cover. The results show that clay content is a key factor defining the limit of water availability in the soil (the wilting point). Significant differences between soil moisture/available water and vegetation cover were observed, defining a positive feedback process that varied in nature along the pluviometric gradient. The more arid the climatic conditions the weaker the feedback between water content and vegetation cover. These observations can be explained by the greater water requirements of plant species growing on the more humid hillslopes, resulting in a rapid uptake of available water and higher water stress. However, at the driest sites the vegetation species were better adapted to the lack of water and more independent of rainfall. Available water at these sites did not decrease, because the lower number of days with a water deficit resulted in water availability for plants over a longer period of time. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available