4.6 Article

A transcriptome signature distinguished sporadic from postradiotherapy radiation-induced sarcomas

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 929-934

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgr064

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Institut Curie 'Programme Incitatif et Cooperatif Retinoblastome: transcriptome et cibles therapeutiques'
  2. Electricite de France: 'Signature fonctionnelle de la radio-induction dans les cancers humains' [RB 2009-02, CEA DSV RB 2010-10]
  3. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Exposure to ionizing radiation is a known risk factor for cancer. However, up to now, rigorously defined scientific criteria that could establish case-by-case the radiation-induced (RI) origin of a tumour have been lacking. To identify genes that could constitute a RI signature, we compared the transcriptome of 12 sarcomas arising in the irradiation field of a primary tumour following radiotherapy with the transcriptome of 12 sporadic sarcomas. This learning/training set contained four leiomyosarcomas, four osteosarcomas and four angiosarcomas in each subgroup. We identified a signature of 135 genes discriminating RI from sporadic sarcomas. The robustness of this signature was tested by the blind case-by-case classification of an independent set of 36 sarcomas of various histologies. Thirty-one sarcomas were classified as RI or sporadic; it was not possible to propose an aetiology for the five others. After the code break, it was found that one sporadic sarcoma was misclassified as RI. Thus, the signature is robust with a sensitivity of 96%, a positive and a negative predictive value of 96 and 100%, respectively and a specificity of 62%. The functions of the genes of the signature suggest that RI sarcomas were subject to chronic oxidative stress probably due to mitochondrial dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available