4.7 Article

Characterization of pectic polysaccharides extracted from apple pomace by hot-compressed water

Journal

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 174-184

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.11.012

Keywords

Pectic polysaccharides; Hot-compressed water; Apple pomace; Response surface methodology; Functional properties

Funding

  1. Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China [2010JQ3012]
  2. Agricultural Scientific and Technical Innovation Project of Shaanxi Province, China [2010NKC-11]
  3. Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry [41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Response surface methodology (RSM) was used to optimize the extraction of pectic polysaccharides from apple pomace by hot-compressed water, by which the optimum levels of the parameters were obtained as follows: extraction temperature 140 degrees C, extraction time 5 min, S:W ratio 1:14. Compared with commercial pectin, the MW, galacturonic acid content, DM and protein of the extracted pectic polysaccharides were lower while ash content and neutral sugars were higher. The endothermic transition temperature and fusion heat of the extracted pectic polysaccharides was lower than commercial one according to DSC analysis. For its rheological properties, it was found that the viscosity of the extracted pectic polysaccharides solution was slightly lower than commercial pectin at lower shear rate region while it decreased sharply when the shear rate increased. Besides, both G' and G moduli of the extracted pectic polysaccharides were lower than the commercial pectin's possibly because of weaker polymer chain interaction, which was also reflected in gel textural properties. However, the extracted pectic polysaccharides showed higher in vitro antioxidant capability and inhibitory effect on HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells than commercial pectin. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available