4.2 Article

Influence of zeta potential on the flocculation of cyanobacteria cells using chitosan modified soil

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 47-53

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.04.017

Keywords

Cyanobacteria blooms; Flocculation; Chitosan; Modified soil; Zeta potential

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2010CB933600]
  2. Science Promotion Program of Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences [YSW2013B05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using chitosan modified soil to flocculate and sediment algal cells has been considered as a promising strategy to combat cyanobacteria blooms waters. However, the flocculation efficiency often varies with algal different zeta potential (ZP) attributed to different growth phases conditions. This article investigated the relationship between ZP of Microcystis aeruginosa and its influence to the flocculation efficiency using chitosan modified soil. Results suggested that the optimal removal efficiency was obtained when the ZP was between -20.7 and -6.7 mV with a removal efficiency of more than 80% in 30 min and large floc size of >350 mu m. When the algal cells were more negatively charged than -20.7 mV, the effect of chitosan modified soil was depressed (<60%) due to the insufficient charge density of chitosan to neutralize and destabilize the algal suspension. When the algal cells were less negative than -6.7 mV or even positively charged, a small floc size (<120 mu m) was formed, which may be difficult to sink under natural water conditions. Therefore, manipulation of ZP provided a viable tool to improve the flocculation efficiency of chitosan modified soil and an important guidance for practical engineering of cyanobacteria bloom control. (C) 2014 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available