4.2 Article

High NO2/NOx emissions downstream of the catalytic diesel particulate filter: An influencing factor study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 55-61

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.02.009

Keywords

Diesel engine; Nitrogen dioxide; Diesel particulate filter; Exhaust temperature; Space velocity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51006085]
  2. Applied Basic Research Project of Yunnan Province [2013FB052]
  3. Department of Education, Yunnan province [2013Z081]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diesel vehicles are responsible for most of the traffic-related nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions, including nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The use of after-treatment devices increases the risk of high NO2/NOx emissions from diesel engines. In order to investigate the factors influencing NO2/NOx emissions, an emission experiment was carried out on a high pressure common-rail, turbocharged diesel engine with a catalytic diesel particulate filter (CDPF). NO2 was measured by a non-dispersive ultraviolet analyzer with raw exhaust sampling. The experimental results show that the NO2/NOx ratios downstream of the CDPF range around 20%-83%, which are significantly higher than those upstream of the CDPF. The exhaust temperature is a decisive factor influencing the NO2/NOx emissions. The maximum NO2/NOx emission appears at the exhaust temperature of 350 degrees C. The space velocity, engine-out PM/NOx ratio (mass based) and CO conversion ratio are secondary factors. At a constant exhaust temperature, the NO2/NOx emissions decreased with increasing space velocity and engine-out PM/NOx ratio. When the CO conversion ratios range from 80% to 90%, the NO2/NOx emissions remain at a high level. (C) 2015 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available