4.8 Article

Differential Effects of Polymorphic Alleles of FGF Receptor 4 on Colon Cancer Growth and Metastasis

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 72, Issue 22, Pages 5767-5777

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3654

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Austrian National Bank [12684]
  2. Austrian Science Foundation [P 19920, P23693]
  3. OTKA MOB [80325]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P23693] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 23693] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A gly(388)arg polymorphism (rs351855) in the transmembrane domain of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR4) is associated with increased risk, staging, and metastasis in several different types of cancer. To specifically assess the impact of the polymorphic FGFR4 in colorectal cancer (CRC), we engineered CRC cell lines with distinct endogenous expression patterns to overexpress either the FGFR4(gly) or FGFR4(arg) alleles. The biologic analyses revealed an oncogenic importance for both polymorphic alleles, but FGFR4(gly) was the stronger inducer of tumor growth, whereas FGFR4(arg) was the stronger inducer of migration. An evaluation of clinical specimens revealed that FGFR4 was upregulated in 20/71 patients independent of gly(388)arg status. There was no correlation between the presence of an FGFR4(arg) allele and CRC or polyp risk in 3,471 participants of the CORSA study. However, among 182 patients with CRC, FGFR4(arg)-carriers had a fivefold higher risk of tumors that were stage II or greater. Together, our results established that both allelic forms of FGFR4 exert an oncogenic impact and may serve equally well as therapeutic targets in CRC. One important implication of our findings is that FGFR4(arg)-carriers are at a higher risk for more aggressive tumors and therefore may profit from early detection measures. Cancer Res; 72(22); 5767-77. (C) 2012 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available