4.8 Article

Development of novel tetravalent anti-CD20 antibodies with potent antitumor activity

Journal

CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 68, Issue 7, Pages 2400-2408

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6663

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the effectiveness of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) Rituximab (C2B8) in the treatment of B-cell lymphoma, its efficacy remains variable and often modest. It seems likely that a combination of multiple mechanisms, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and apoptotic signaling, underlies the therapeutic success of anti-CD20 mAbs. Unfortunately, all the current anti-CD20 mAbs effective in CDC are relatively inactive in signaling cell death and vice versa. In this study, we developed two genetically engineered tetravalent antibodies (TetraMcAb) respectively derived from the anti-CD20 mAbs C2B8 and 2F2. TetraMcAbs, with a molecular mass only 25 kDa higher than native divalent antibodies (DiMcAb), were shown not only to be as effective in mediating CDC and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against B-lymphoma cells as DiMcAbs but also to have antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing activity markedly superior to that of DiMcAbs. Interestingly, whereas 2172 and C2B8 were equally effective in inducing cell growth arrest and apoptosis, the functions of their tetravalent versions, 2F2(ScFvHL)(4)-Fc and C2B8(ScFvHL)(4)-Fc, were significantly different. 2F2(ScFvHL)4-Fc exhibited exceptionally more potent antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing activity than that of C2B8(ScFvHL)4-Fc. Immunotherapeutic studies further showed that 2F2(ScFvHL)4-Fc was far more effective in prolonging the survival of severe combined immunodeficient mice hearing systemic Daudi or Raji tumors than C2B8, 2F2. and C2B8(ScFvHL)(4)-Fe, suggesting that it might he a promising therapeutic agent for B-cell lymphoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available