4.1 Article

Pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Anatomoclinic aspects, therapeutic results and evolutive particularities

Journal

CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 169-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.01.003

Keywords

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Child; Radiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Toxicity; Prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. - We retrospectively analyzed anatomoclinic, therapeutic and evolutive particularities of 74 young patients (<= 20 years) with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated between 1993 and 2005. Patients and methods. - Initial work-up included a fiberoptic nasofibroscopy with biopsy, tomodensitometry and/or MRI of nasopharynx and neck, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography and bone scan. Patients were treated with either primary chemotherapy (epirubicin and cisplatin) followed by radiotherapy or concomitant radiochemotherapy (five fluorouracil and cisplatin). Radiotherapy was delivered to a total dose of 70 to 75 Gy to nasopharynx and involved cervical lymph nodes and 50 Gy to the remainder cervical areas. Results. - The median age was 16 years. Sixty-three percent of patients had undifferentiated tumors. Sixty-six percent had locally advanced tumor. With a median follow-up of 107 months, one patient presented a local relapse, 24 patients developed distant metastases with a median delay of 7 months. The 5 years overall survival and disease-free survival were 66 and 65%. Late complications were dominated by dry mouth and endocrine disorders. Comments. - Pediatric nasopharyngeal carcinoma is characterized by an early metastatic diffusion. Local control is excellent but with severe late toxicities. New techniques of radiotherapy and new molecules of chemotherapy could improve these results. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of the Societe francaise de radiotherapie oncologique (SFRO).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available