4.6 Article

A Raman peak recognition method based automated fluorescence subtraction algorithm for retrieval of Raman spectra of highly fluorescent samples

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 2770-2778

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4ay03025g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Key Lab of Precision Measurement Technology & Instrument of Tsinghua University
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61205147]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intense fluorescence background is a major problem in the application of Raman spectroscopy. An appropriate algorithm which can faithfully retrieve weak tissue Raman signals is required. In this article, we propose a new algorithm for automated and artifact-free recovery of Raman spectra which combines a novel Raman peak recognition method (RPR method) with an improved iterative smoothing method (SG-SR method). The SG-SR method, based on the modified Savitzky-Golay iterative process, substantially improves its convergence speed. By applying a novel negative relaxation factor to the successive relaxation iterative method, automatic recognition of Raman peaks is realized. In the proposed algorithm (RIA-SG-RPR algorithm), a real Raman peak position is first detected by the RPR method to serve as the intrinsic criterion of convergence for the SG-SR method to avoid human interference. Then, real Raman signals are recovered from the iterative procedure of the SG-SR method. This algorithm has been optimized and validated with mathematically simulated Raman spectra as well as experimentally recorded Raman spectra from various fluorescent samples, resulting in a significant improvement in the rejection of both high fluorescence background and direct human intervention. This algorithm drastically avoids false Raman features to benefit the utilization of Raman spectroscopy to characterize molecular specifics in more challenging Raman applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available