4.7 Article

Antiproliferative activity of novel imidazopyridine derivatives on castration-resistant human prostate cancer cells

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 353, Issue 1, Pages 59-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.07.002

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Imidazopyridine; Androgen receptor; PI3K/Akt; p66Shc

Categories

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [R01 CA88184]
  2. Department of Defense PCa Training Grant [PC094594, PC121645]
  3. University of Nebraska Medical Center Bridge Fund
  4. CDMRP [542608, PC121645, 546591, PC094594] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) relapses after a short period of androgen deprivation therapy and becomes the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CR PCa); to which the treatment is limited. Hence, it is imperative to identify novel therapeutic agents towards this patient population. In the present study, antiproliferative activities of novel imidazopyridines were compared. Among three derivatives, PHE, AMD and AMN, examined, AMD showed the highest inhibitory activity on LNCaP C-81 cell proliferation, following dose- and time-dependent manner. Additionally, AMD exhibited significant antiproliferative effect against a panel of PCa cells, but not normal prostate epithelial cells. Further, when compared to AMD, its derivative DME showed higher inhibitory activities on PCa cell proliferation, clonogenic potential and in vitro tumorigenicity. The inhibitory activity was apparently in part due to the induction of apoptosis. Mechanistic studies indicate that AMD and DME treatments inhibited both AR and PI3K/Akt signaling. The results suggest that better understanding of inhibitory mechanisms of AMD and DME could help design novel therapeutic agents for improving the treatment of CR PCa. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available