4.7 Review

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their role in CTLA-4 blockade therapy

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 63, Issue 9, Pages 977-983

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-014-1570-7

Keywords

Ipilimumab; Myeloid-derived suppressor cells; Immune checkpoint blockade; CTLA-4; Immune therapy; 19th Danish Cancer Society Symposium

Funding

  1. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  2. Swedish Cancer Society [12-0598]
  3. Stockholm Cancer Society [121103]
  4. Swedish Medical Research Council [K2011-66X-15387-07-3VR]
  5. Stockholm City Council [20110070]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immune checkpoints are a series of inhibitory pathways that are crucial for modulating the intensity and duration of immune response. Among these checkpoints, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) has been shown to be a key regulator of the early activation of na < ve and memory T cells. Immune checkpoint blockade is emerging as one of the most promising therapeutic approaches directed toward the activation of the immune response against tumors. The first of these therapies that has been FDA approved is ipilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks CTLA-4. The in cis effects that CTLA-4 blockade has on T cells have been properly described, but there are still questions to be answered regarding the indirect or in trans effects. One of the alternative cellular populations that may play a role in the outcome of CTLA-4 blockade therapy is myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which have recently been associated with clinical outcome in advanced melanoma. In addition to this, MDSCs have been shown to be decreased in number and functional potential after treatment with ipilimumab. A better clarification of what effects CTLA-4 blockade may have on these cellular populations is likely to provide insights on possible predictive biomarkers for CTLA-4 blockade therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available