4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The A, B and C of Her-2 DNA vaccine development

Journal

CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY
Volume 57, Issue 11, Pages 1711-1717

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00262-008-0464-y

Keywords

Her-2; ErbB-2; DNA vaccine; cancer vaccine; autoimmunity

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA022453] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction The development of Her-2 DNA vaccine has progressed through three phases that can be categorized as phase A: the pursuit of Her-2 as a tumor-associated antigen, phase B: tilting the balance between tumor immunity and autoimmunity and phase C: the on-going clinical trials. Materials and methods In phase A, a panel of human ErbB-2 or Her-2 plasmids were constructed to encode non-transforming Her-2 derivatives. The immunogenicity and anti-tumor activity of Her-2 DNA vaccines were tested in human Her-2 transgenic mice with or without the depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs). However, Treg depletion or other immune modulating regimens may increase the risk of autoimmunity. In phase B, the balance between tumor immunity and autoimmunity was assessed by monitoring the development of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis (EAT). To test the efficacy of Her-2 DNA vaccines in cancer patients, clinical trials have been initiated in phase C. Results and conclusions Significant anti-Her-2 and anti-tumor activity was observed when Her-2 transgenic mice were electro-vaccinated after Treg depletion. Susceptibility to EAT was also enhanced by Treg depletion and there was mutual amplification between Her-2 immunity and EAT development. Although Tregs regulate both EAT and Her-2 immunity, their effector mechanisms may differ. It may be possible to amplify tumor immunity with improved strategies that can by-pass undue autoimmunity. Critical information will be revealed in the next decade to expedite the development of cancer vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available