4.5 Article

No Association between Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Breast Cancer Risk among Chinese Women

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 467-469

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1365

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01CA124558, R01CA64277, R01CA90899]
  2. NIH/NICHD [5K12 HD043483-09]
  3. Vanderbilt Ingram Center [P30CA68485]
  4. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: As breast and ovarian cancers may have similar etiologies, this study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that breast cancer shares common genetic susceptibility variants with ovarian cancer. Methods: Ten genetic variants in nine loci were previously identified to be associated with ovarian cancer risk among Caucasian women; an additional 353 variants in high-linkage disequilibrium (r(2) >= 0.6) among Han Chinese were identified. Data were available from the Affymetrix Genome-Wide Array (6.0) or MACH imputation for 25 and 78 common genetic variants [minor allele frequency (MAF) >= 0.05], respectively. Associations with breast cancer risk were evaluated by additive logistic regression models among 2,918 breast cancer cases and 2,324 controls. Results: No associations with breast cancer risk were evident for 103 ovarian cancer susceptibility variants in five loci. Four loci were not evaluated, as they included only rare variants (MAF < 0.05). Conclusions: Ovarian cancer susceptibility variants identified in Caucasian women were not associated with breast cancer risk among 5,242 Chinese women. Impact: These findings suggest that breast and ovarian cancer may not share common susceptibility variants among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 22(3); 467-9. (c) 2013 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available