4.5 Article

Common Genetic Variation at BARD1 Is Not Associated with Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages 1032-1038

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0909

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services
  2. NIH [5UO1 CA86389, R01-CA74415, R01-CA102776, R01-CA083855, CA128978]
  3. MUV Comprensive Cancer Center
  4. Austrian Society for Endocrinological Oncology
  5. Cancer Research, UK [C1287/A10118, C1287/A8874, C8197/A10123, C5047/A8385]
  6. NIHR
  7. Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  8. Ligue National Contre le Cancer
  9. Association for International Cancer Research [AICR-07-0454]
  10. Association Le cancer du sein, parlons-en! Award
  11. Dutch Cancer Society [NKI 1998-1854, NKI 2004-3088, NKI 2007-3756]
  12. Helsinki University Central Hospital
  13. Academy of Finland [132473]
  14. Finnish Cancer Society
  15. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  16. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  17. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ)/Reseau de Medecine Genetique Appliquee (RMGA)
  18. CURE Foundation
  19. Canadian Breast Cancer Research Alliance (CBCRA)
  20. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ)
  21. CIHR/RAMP
  22. D Health Research Foundation
  23. NHMRC [145684, 288704, 454508]
  24. National Breast Cancer Foundation
  25. Queensland Cancer Fund
  26. Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria
  27. Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Tasmania
  28. Cancer Councils of New South Wales, South Australia
  29. Cancer Foundation of Western Australia
  30. NCI [CA116201]
  31. breast Cancer Research Foundation
  32. Komen Foundation for the cure
  33. [PBZ_KBN_122/P05/2004]
  34. [HHSN21620074400C]
  35. Cancer Research UK [10118, 11022, 11174] Funding Source: researchfish
  36. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0510-10096] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Inherited BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations confer elevated breast cancer risk. Knowledge of factors that can improve breast cancer risk assessment in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers may improve personalized cancer prevention strategies. Methods: A cohort of 5,546 BRCA1 and 2,865 BRCA2 mutation carriers was used to evaluate risk of breast cancer associated with BARD1 Cys557Ser. In a second nonindependent cohort of 1,537 of BRCA1 and 839 BRCA2 mutation carriers, BARD1 haplotypes were also evaluated. Results: The BARD1 Cys557Ser variant was not significantly associated with risk of breast cancer from single SNP analysis, with a pooled effect estimate of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71-1.15) in BRCA1 carriers and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.59-1.29) in BRCA2 carriers. Further analysis of haplotypes at BARD1 also revealed no evidence that additional common genetic variation not captured by Cys557Ser was associated with breast cancer risk. Conclusion: Evidence to date does not support a role for BARD1 variation, including the Cy557Ser variant, as a modifier of risk in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Impact: Interactors of BRCA1/2 have been implicated as modifiers of BRCA1/2-associated cancer risk. Our finding that BARD1 does not contribute to this risk modification may focus research on other genes that do modify BRCA1/2-associated cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(5); 1032-38. (C) 2011 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available