4.3 Article

Germline HOXB13 p.Gly84Glu mutation and risk of colorectal cancer

Journal

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages 424-427

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.03.003

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Risk; HOXB13 gene; Genetic polymorphism

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [CA-95-011]
  2. Ontario Registry for Studies of Familial Colorectal Cancer [U01 CA074783]
  3. Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry [U01 CA097735]
  4. Colon Cancer Family Registry (CFRs)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The HOXB13 pGly84Glu mutation has recently been associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer but the association of other cancer sites with this allele has not been assessed. Data has suggested that HOXB13 expression levels are decreased in colorectal cancer (CRC) cell lines indicating this gene may be involved in colorectal tumourigenesis. Methods: To evaluate a potential association of this mutation with CRC, we genotyped the mutation in 2695 CRC cases and 4593 controls from population-based registries in Canada and Australia. Results: The HOXB13 pGly84Glu mutation was more common in CRC cases than controls (0.48% vs. 0.17%, P = 0.02) indicating a significant association between the HOXB13 variant and CRC risk (OR = 2.8; 95% CI: 1.2-6.8). This association was attenuated but remained significant with the inclusion of previously published and publicly available genotype data. Pedigree analysis of cases and controls revealed that 7/21 HOXB13 mutation carriers had a family history of prostate cancer. Discussion: This report is the first to suggest a risk of CRC associated with mutations in the HOXB13 gene. These findings require further validation but may be of importance in the screening and genetic counseling of families known to carry the HOXB13 pGly84Glu mutation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available