4.4 Article

Multiplatform Comparison of Molecular Oncology Tests Performed on Cytology Specimens and Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

Journal

CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages 30-39

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21476

Keywords

DNA extraction; fine-needle aspirate; molecular oncology test; next-generation sequencing; Sanger sequencing; single-nucleotide primer extension assay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDMolecular oncology testing is important for patient management, and requests for the molecular analysis of cytology specimens are increasingly being made. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell blocks of such specimens have been routinely used for molecular diagnosis. However, the inability to assess cellularity before cell block preparation is a pitfall of their use. In this study, various cytologic preparations were tested with several molecular test platforms, and the results were compared with paired FFPE tissue. METHODSSeventy-seven cytology cases, including fine-needle aspiration smears, touch preparations, and SurePath thin-layer preparations, were selected from the archives. Areas of interest were removed from the slide with a matrix capture solution. DNA extracted from the cells was evaluated by mutation analysis for BRAF, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), RAS, and a 50-gene panel with various testing platforms (single-nucleotide primer extension assay, Sanger sequencing, and next-generation sequencing). Thirty-eight tumors with available FFPE tissue were tested in parallel. RESULTSThe average DNA concentration was 299 ng/mu L for the cytology specimens and 171 ng/mu g for the paired FFPE tissue. Point mutations and large deletions were detected in BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, HRAS, and EGFR genes. In comparison with FFPE tissue, 5- to 8-fold less input DNA was needed when cytology preparations were used. The concordance between cytology specimens and FFPE tissue was 100%. CONCLUSIONSCytologic preparations were found to be a reliable source for molecular oncology testing. DNA derived from cytology specimens performed well on multiple platforms, and 100% concordance was observed between cytology specimens and FFPE tissue. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:30-9. (c) 2014 American Cancer Society. Cytology specimens are a cost-effective, reliable source for molecular oncology testing and may save patients from additional procedures when adequate material is available.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available