4.3 Article

HBV infection increases the risk of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis

Journal

CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 529-537

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-0144-2

Keywords

HBV; Pancreatic cancer; Etiology; Prevention; Meta-analysis

Funding

  1. Chongqing Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (CSTC) [2009BA5045]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81202220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is reported to be associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (PaC), but it remains controversial whether this is a causal relationship. In addition, it is unclear whether the status of HBV infection also affects PaC risk. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to more closely examine the association between HBV infection and PaC. The studies included in the meta-analysis were identified and retrieved from PubMed and several other databases. The literature search was conducted up until August 2012. We adopted the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.1 in a combined analysis of pooled relative risk (RR) with their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects and a fixed-effects model. Nine studies including 6 case-control and 3 cohort studies met eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis showed that the PaC risk was positively correlated with HBV infection when comparing with 'never exposed to HBV' subgroup, the pooled RR was 1.39 (95 % CI 1.22-1.59, p < 0.00001) in chronic HBV carriers, 1.41 (95 % CI 1.06-1.87, p = 0.02) in past exposure to HBV, and 3.83 (95 % CI 1.76-8.36, p = 0.0007) in active HBV infection. Using a stratified analysis, we also found that the risk of PaC was independent of smoking, alcohol drinking, and diabetes. Findings from this meta-analysis strongly support that HBV infection is associated with an increased risk of PaC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available