4.4 Article

miR-126: An indicator of poor prognosis and recurrence in histologically lymph node-negative gastric cancer

Journal

CANCER BIOMARKERS
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 437-445

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/CBM-181526

Keywords

Gastric cancer; lymph node negative; prognosis; recurrence; miR-126

Categories

Funding

  1. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [12zz102]
  2. Yi Gong Jiao Cha Foundation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University [YG2016MS65]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [17PJ1406000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Few biomarkers are available for the prediction of prognosis and recurrence in lymph node (LN)-negative gastric cancer (GC) currently. miR-126 functions as a tumor suppressor in GC, however, its clinical significance in LN-negative GC remains unknown. AIM: To investigate the associations of tissue miR-126 level with the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome of LN-negative GC patients. METHODS: Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to examine the tissue miR-126 level in 315 LN-negative GC patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The associations of tissue miR-126 level with clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with matched adjacent non-tumor tissues, miR-126 expression was significantly down-regulated in tumor tissues. A reduced tissue miR-126 level statistically correlated with aggressive clinicopathological characteristics, including larger tumor size, deeper local invasion, and poorer prognosis. Notably, multivariate analysis identified advanced T stage and low miR-126 level as independent predictors of the unfavorable prognosis and recurrence of LN-negative GC. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate for the first time that advanced T stage and low miR-126 level are predictors of unfavorable prognosis and recurrence in LN-negative GC patients. These parameters should be taken into account to stratify patients for adjuvant therapy and close follow-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available