4.6 Article

Infinite order cross-validated local polynomial regression

Journal

JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS
Volume 185, Issue 2, Pages 510-525

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.06.003

Keywords

Model selection; Efficiency; Rates of convergence

Funding

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC
  2. Shared Hierarchical Academic Research Computing Network (SHARCNET)
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1301377] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1301377] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many practical problems require nonparametric estimates of regression functions, and local polynomial regression has emerged as a leading approach. In applied settings practitioners often adopt either the local constant or local linear variants, or choose the order of the local polynomial to be slightly greater than the order of the maximum derivative estimate required. But such ad hoc determination of the polynomial order may not be optimal in general, while the joint determination of the polynomial order and bandwidth presents some interesting theoretical and practical challenges. In this paper we propose a data-driven approach towards the joint determination of the polynomial order and bandwidth, provide theoretical underpinnings, and demonstrate that improvements in both finite-sample efficiency and rates of convergence can thereby be obtained. In the case where the true data generating process (DGP) is in fact a polynomial whose order does not depend on the sample size, our method is capable of attaining the rate often associated with correctly specified parametric models, while the estimator is shown to be uniformly consistent for a much larger class of DGPs. Theoretical underpinnings are provided and finite-sample properties are examined. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available