4.5 Review

Targeting MAPK pathway in melanoma therapy

Journal

CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS
Volume 32, Issue 3-4, Pages 567-584

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10555-013-9433-9

Keywords

BRAF; MAPK; MEK; Melanoma; RAS

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-93810, MOP-110974]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute [2011-700714]
  3. Cancer Research Society
  4. Canadian Dermatology Foundation
  5. University of British Columbia Graduate Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

New drugs targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway have generated striking clinical response in melanoma therapy. From the discovery of BRAF mutation in melanoma in 2002, to the approval of first BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib for melanoma treatment by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2011, therapies targeting the MAPK pathway have been proven effective in less than a decade. The success of vemurafenib stimulated more intensive investigation of the molecular mechanisms of melanoma pathogenesis and development of new treatment strategies targeting specific molecules in MAPK pathway. Although selective BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors demonstrated improved overall survival of metastatic melanoma patients, limited duration or development of resistance to BRAF inhibitors have been reported. Patients with metastatic melanoma still face very poor prognosis and lack of clarified therapies. Studies and multiple clinical trials on more potent and selective small molecule inhibitory compounds to further improve the clinical effects and overcome drug resistance are underway. In this review, we analyzed the therapeutic potentials of each member of the MAPK signaling pathway, summarized important MAPK-inhibiting drugs, and discussed the promising combination treatment targeting multiple targets in melanoma therapy, which may overcome the drawbacks of current drugs treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available