4.4 Article

Early atherosclerosis in ulcerative colitis: cross-sectional case-control study

Journal

JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 656-664

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12297

Keywords

atherosclerosis; carotid intima media thickness; homocysteine; insulin resistance; ulcerative colitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To study the extent of early atherosclerosis in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients by measuring carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and the correlation between CIMT, serum homocysteine level and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) in UC. METHODS: We studied 60 UC patients and 60 healthy controls. Individuals with risk factors for atherosclerosis were excluded from the study. Fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, HOMA-IR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), serum vitamin B12 and homocysteine levels were measured in all participants. CIMT was measured using a B-mode duplex imaging study. RESULTS: UC patients had significantly higher CIMT than controls (P < 0.05). ESR, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR and serum homocysteine levels were also significantly higher in UC patients (P < 0.05). Pearson's correlation coefficient showed significant correlations between: (i) CIMT and patients' age, duration of UC, HOMA-IR, and homocysteine level (P < 0.05); (ii) serum homocysteine and duration of UC, fasting insulin level, HOMA-IR and CIMT (P < 0.01); (iii) HOMA-IR and age, duration of UC, serum homocysteine and CIMT (P < 0.01). Multi-regression models showed that serum homocysteine affects CIMT and duration of UC independently, whereas participants' age and duration of UC affects HOMA-IR independently. CONCLUSIONS: Higher CIMT might indicate subclinical atherosclerosis in UC patients. Patients' age, duration of UC, HOMA-IR and homocysteine levels are important factors associated with increased CIMT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available