4.1 Article

Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in combination with a mild strain of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) associated with viral satellite RNAs to enhance growth and protection against a virulent strain of CMV in tomato

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 177-186

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07060661.2012.685495

Keywords

biological control; Cucumber mosaic virus; plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria; tomato; viral satellite RNA

Categories

Funding

  1. Research Administration University of Kuwait [SL 02/07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An indigenous strain of Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) associated with a naturally occurring benign viral satellite RNA (345 bp long), referred to as CMV-KU1, although effective as a protective biocontrol agent against the damaging effects of the virulent CMV-16 strain, produced negative side-effects such as mild stunting, vigour reduction and about 20% yield loss in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L.) plants. The efficacy of using a mixture of two plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas rhizophilia, to compensate for vegetative and yield loss caused by CMV-KU1 in tomato plants, was evaluated in greenhouse experiments. In addition to promoting plant growth, PGPRs are known to enhance systemic defences in plants against foliar pathogens such as viruses that attack tissues distant to PGPR sphere of activity. The use of PGPR and CMV-KU1 together successfully promoted vegetative growth and fruit yield in tomato plants to values equivalent to that of the healthy controls. The combination used also enhanced overall protection of the plants against the severe CMV-16 virus with about 91.3% disease prevention. Serological analysis using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) also indicated a lower incidence of CMV-16 infection in protected test plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available