4.1 Article

β-Carotene autoxidation: oxygen copolymerization, non-vitamin A products, and immunological activity

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 305-316

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjc-2013-0494

Keywords

beta-carotene autoxidation; oxygen copolymer; non-vitamin A oxidation products; immune function; gene expression

Funding

  1. Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
  2. National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carotenoids are reported to have immunological effects independent of vitamin A activity. Although antioxidant activity has been suggested as a basis of action, the ability of carotenoids to autoxidize to numerous non-vitamin A products with immunological activity is an alternative yet to be fully explored. We have undertaken a systematic study of beta-carotene autoxidation and tested the product mixture for immunological activity. Autoxidation proceeds predominantly by oxygen copolymerization, leading to a defined, reproducible product corresponding to net uptake of almost 8 molar equivalents of oxygen. The product, termed OxC-beta, empirical formula C40H60O15 versus C40H56 for beta-carotene, contains more than 30% oxygen (w/w) and 85% beta-carotene oxygen copolymers (w/w) as well as minor amounts of many C8-C18 norisoprenoid compounds. No vitamin A or higher molecular weight norisoprenoids are present. The predominance of polymeric products has not been reported previously. The polymer appears to be a less polymerized form of sporopollenin, a biopolymer found in exines of spores and pollen. Autoxidations of lycopene and canthaxanthin show a similar predominance of polymeric products. OxC-beta exhibits immunological activity in a PCR gene expression array, indicating that carotenoid oxidation produces non-vitamin A products with immunomodulatory potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available