4.7 Article

Composition of Mineral Produced by Dental Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 1568-1574

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0022034515599765

Keywords

MSCs; dental stem cells; dentine; cementum; Raman spectroscopy; mineralization

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K011421/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MR/K011421/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells isolated from different dental tissues have been described to have osteogenic/odontogenic-like differentiation capacity, but little attention has been paid to the biochemical composition of the material that each produces. Here, we used Raman spectroscopy to analyze the mineralized materials produced in vitro by different dental cell populations, and we compared them with the biochemical composition of native dental tissues. We show that different dental stem cell populations produce materials that differ in their mineral and matrix composition and that these differ from those of native dental tissues. In vitro, BCMP (bone chip mass population), SCAP (stem cells from apical papilla), and SHED (stem cells from human-exfoliated deciduous teeth) cells produce a more highly mineralized matrix when compared with that produced by PDL (periodontal ligament), DPA (dental pulp adult), and GF (gingival fibroblast) cells. Principal component analyses of Raman spectra further demonstrated that the crystallinity and carbonate substitution environments in the material produced by each cell type varied, with DPA cells, for example, producing a more carbonate-substituted mineral and with SCAP, SHED, and GF cells creating a less crystalline material when compared with other dental stem cells and native tissues. These variations in mineral composition reveal intrinsic differences in the various cell populations, which may in turn affect their specific clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available