4.6 Article

Regional Differential Expression of TREK-1 at Left Ventricle in Myocardial Infarction

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 826-833

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.01.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cardiology Laboratory, Cancer Research Institute
  2. Department of Physiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Altered membrane electrophysiology contributes to arrhythmias after myocardial infarction (MI). TREK-1 channel is essential in various physiological and pathological conditions through its regulation on resting membrane potential and voltage-dependent action potential duration. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in gene expression and electrophysiology of TREK-1 in the left ventricle in a MI model. Methods: Fifty-five rats were divided into 5 groups: sham-operated group, 6 hours, 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days post MI group (n = 11 per group). TREK-1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression level in the infarct region (IR) and infarct border region (IBR) were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and TREK-1 current density at the IBR was recorded with whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Results: TREK-1 mRNA expression decreased significantly in both endocardial and epicardial cells in the infarct region after MI. Conversely, TREK-1 increased significantly in endocardial and epicardial cells from the IBR (P < 0.01). Current density of TREK-1 at IBR increased significantly in both epicardial and endocardial cells after MI (P < 0.01). Conclusions: TREK-1 demonstrates specific changes in expression and electrophysiological function in left ventricle post MI. These results suggest that TREK-1 may participate in pathophysiologic alteration and electrical remodelling of left ventricular myocardium after MI, which may eventually lead to post-MI ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available