4.1 Article

Carbohydrates in alfalfa-timothy mixtures predicted with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy equations developed for single species

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages 279-283

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING, NRC RESEARCH PRESS
DOI: 10.4141/CJAS08128

Keywords

Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy; sugars; Phleum pratense; Medicago sativa

Funding

  1. Action concertee AAC - FQRNT - MAPAQ - NOVALAIT Inc.
  2. MOE (Ministry of education of China) - AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nie, Z., Tremblay, G. F., Belanger, G., Berthiaume, R., Castonguay, Y., Bertrand, A., Michaud, R., Allard, G. and Han J. 2009. Carbohydrates in alfalfa-timothy mixtures predicted with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy equations developed for single species. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 89: 279-283. Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (LAIRS) equations previously developed with a calibration set that included samples of both timothy and alfalfa to predict carbohydrate fractions in mixed samples of both species. Timothy and alfalfa mixed samples were prepared with the alfalfa proportion ranging from 0 to 100%, with increments of 4%. With previously developed NIBS equations based on samples of single species of timothy and alfalfa, concentrations of total ethanol soluble carbohydrates (TESC), starch, and neutral detergent soluble carbohydrates (NDSC) of the mixed samples were predicted successfully, but concentrations of organic acids (OA) and neutral detergent soluble fiber (NDSF) were unsuccessfully predicted. Adding 13 mixed samples to the initial calibration set of around 110 samples of pure timothy and alfalfa samples improved the accuracy of already successful predictions for TESC, starch, and NDSC, and resulted in a successful prediction for NDSF in timothy and alfalfa mixtures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available