Journal
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 323-336Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180114000206
Keywords
medicalization; love; love drugs; neuroenhancement; marriage; ethics
Funding
- Wellcome Trust [086041/Z/08/Z]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Pharmaceuticals or other emerging technologies could be used to enhance (or diminish) feelings of lust, attraction, and attachment in adult romantic partnerships. Although such interventions could conceivably be used to promote individual (and couple) well-being, their widespread development and/or adoption might lead to the 'medicalization' of human love and heartache-for some, a source of a serious concern. In this essay, we argue that the medicalization of love need not necessarily be problematic, on balance, but could plausibly be expected to have either good or bad consequences depending upon how it unfolds. By anticipating some of the specific ways in which these technologies could yield unwanted outcomes, bioethicists and others can help to direct the course of love's medicalization-should it happen to occur-more toward the 'good' side than the 'bad.'
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available