4.4 Article

The Influence of Anthropometry and Body Composition on Children's Bone Health: The Childhood Health, Activity and Motor Performance School (The CHAMPS) Study, Denmark

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 97-104

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9941-9

Keywords

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; Bone mass; Bone density; Lean mass; Fat mass; Body composition

Funding

  1. Nordea foundation
  2. TRYG foundation
  3. IMK foundation
  4. Region of Southern Denmark
  5. Egmont Foundation
  6. A. J. Andersen Foundation
  7. Danish Rheumatism Association
  8. TEAM Denmark

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overweight, physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour have become increasing problems during the past decade. Increased sedentary behaviour may change the body composition (BC) by increasing the fat mass relative to the lean mass (LM). These changes may influence bone health to describe how anthropometry and BC predict the development of the bone accruement. The longitudinal study is a part of The CHAMPS study-DK. Children were DXA scanned at baseline and at 2-year follow-up. BC (LM, BF %) and BMC, BMD and BA were measured. The relationship between bone traits, anthropometry and BC was analysed by multilevel regression analyses. Of the invited children, 742/800 (93 %) accepted to participate. Of these, 682/742 (92 %) participated at follow-up. Mean (range) of age at baseline was 9.5 years (7.7-12.1). Height, BMI, LM and BF % predicted bone mineral accrual and bone size positively and independently. Height and BMI are both positive predictors of bone accruement. LM is a more precise predictor of bone traits than BF % in both genders. The effects of height and BMI and LM on bone accruement are nearly identical in the two genders, while changes in BF % have different but positive effects on bone accretion in both boys and girls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available