4.4 Article

Changes in Cross-Sectional Area of Spinal Canal and Vertebral Body Under 2 Years of Teriparatide Treatment: Results from the EUROFORS Study

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 130-136

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-010-9386-8

Keywords

Osteoporosis; Teriparatide; Spinal canal; Parathyroid hormone; Image processing

Funding

  1. Eli Lilly
  2. Lilly Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The treatment of osteoporotic patients with teriparatide is associated with a significant increase in bone formation and gain of bone mass. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to determine if the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the spinal canal and the vertebral body is affected by teriparatide treatment. Narrowing of the spinal canal might represent a safety problem, while widening of the vertebral CSA might improve mechanical stability. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans of vertebra T12 were obtained at baseline and after 6, 12, and 24 months of teriparatide treatment (20 mu g/day) from 44 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis participating in the prospective, randomized EUROFORS study. The CSA of the spinal canal did not decrease but increased marginally by 0.9% (2.6 mm(2)) over 24 months (P < 0.001), with a range from -0.5% (-2 mm(2)) to 3.1% (+8 mm(2)). Even when analyzing the spinal CSA on a slice-by-slice basis, no clinically relevant narrowing of the spinal canal was observed. For vertebral bodies, the CSA increased by 0.7% (5.7 mm(2)) over 24 months (P < 0.001), with a range from -0.4% (-3 mm(2)) to 1.6% (+14 mm(2)). Our data do not provide evidence for safety concerns regarding spinal canal narrowing. On the other hand, the increases observed for vertebral CSA apparently also only minimally contribute to the mechanical strengthening of the vertebral body under teriparatide treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available