4.4 Article

Analysis of Association of LRP5, LRP6, SOST, DKK1, and CTNNB1 Genes with Bone Mineral Density in a Slovenian Population

Journal

CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages 501-506

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00223-009-9306-y

Keywords

Dickkopf1; Sclerostin; beta-Catenin; Wnt signaling pathway; Single-nucleotide polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Wnt pathway has a bifunctional role in bone mass regulation, influencing osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The Wnt pathway genes are therefore candidate genes for susceptibility to osteoporosis. In our study, we focused on the effects of polymorphisms in selected Wnt pathway genes: low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 (LRP5 and LRP6), Dickkopf1 (DKK1), sclerostin (SOST), and beta-catenin (CTNNB1). We genotyped 652 subjects for the following polymorphisms: A1330V in LRP5; I1062V in LRP6; E232K in DKK1; D32Y, G34V, and N287S in CTNNB1; and -1397_-1396insGGA in SOST. Bone mineral density (BMD) was also measured. The allele frequencies were as follows: for A1330V C:T = 87%:13%, for I1062V C:T = 20%:80%, and for -1397_-1396insGGA-:GGA = 64%:36%. The studied nucleotide changes in the DKK1 and CTNNB1 genes were shown not to be polymorphic. In a Slovenian population, no association was shown between lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in A1330V (P = 0.151 and 0.243) and in I1062V (P = 0.209 and 0.405). We observed a difference between SOST genotypes, corresponding to an allele dose effect, which was borderline significant for lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD (P = 0.047 and 0.085); but this did not survive the adjustment for multiple testing. These results indicate that a larger sample size would be necessary to detect these subtle effects. Our results suggest that A1330V in LRP5, I1062V in LRP6, and -1397_-1396insGGA in SOST are not associated with BMD in the Slovenian population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available