4.2 Article

Factorial validity and reliability of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in the Brazilian physician population

Journal

CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 1439-1445

Publisher

CADERNOS SAUDE PUBLICA
DOI: 10.1590/S0102-311X2010000700023

Keywords

Mental Health; Physicians; Questionnaire

Funding

  1. CFM (Federal Council of Medicine)
  2. CNPq (National Research Council)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used screening instrument. One-and two-factor structures have been identified in some countries. In Brazil, the best factor structure is still unclear. This study aimed at knowing its factorial validity and reliability, and testing the one-factor and two-factor models. The participants were 7,512 Brazilian physicians. They answered the GHQ-12 and demographic questions. Unrotated (one-factor) and rotated (two-factor) structures of the GHQ-12 were extracted by principal component analysis. Confirmatory factor analyses (ML) were used to compare the one-and two-factor solutions. The two-factor model fitted the data better than the one-factor one. Those two factors were depression and social dysfunction, and they showed themselves to be directly correlated to one another. They also showed adequate reliability coefficients. The two-factor model is remarkably adequate, showing better fit indices, although it is acceptable to admit a common factor, which could be defined as psychological distress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available