4.4 Article

Pathogenic alteration in severe burn wounds

Journal

BURNS
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 90-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.02.006

Keywords

Pathogenic alteration; Severe burns; Time related trends; Bacterial resistance

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China Emphasis [30730091]
  2. program for Outstanding Medical Academic leader [LJ06005]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2005CB522603]
  4. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality Emphasis [08411952800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aims to define the trend of time related changes with local bacterial alteration of bacterial resistance in severe burns in our burn center during a 12-year period. Retrospective analysis of microbiological results on severely burned wounds between 1998 and 2009 was carried out. A study of 3615 microbial isolates was performed. Staphylococcus aureus was the most commonly isolated pathogen (38.2%) followed by A. baumannii (16.2%), Streptococcus viridans (11.4%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.4%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS, 9,2%). The species ratios of S. aureus and A. baumannii increased significantly from 1st to 8th week of hospitalization, while those of Streptococcus viridans, P. aeruginosa and coagulase-negative staphylococci decreased during the same period. Bacterial resistance rates were compared between the periods 1998-2003 and 2004-2009. Vancomycin remained as the most sensitive antibiotic in S. aureus including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). It was very likely that the majority of infections caused by Streptococcus viridans, P. aeruginosa and coagulase-negative staphylococci occurred in the early stage of burn course and the majority of infections caused by A. baumannii occurred 4 weeks after admission. The use of different antibiotics was probably the major contributor to these trends. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available