4.5 Article

Improving public health information: a data quality intervention in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages 176-182

Publisher

WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.092759

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. United Kingdom Department for International Development
  2. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the effect of an intervention to improve the quality-of data used to monitor the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of the human immunodeficiency virus in South Africa. Methods The study involved 58 antenatal clinics and 20 delivery wards (37 urban, 21 rural and 20 semi-urban) in KwaZulu-Natal province that provided PMTCT services and reported data to the District Health Information System. The data improvement intervention, which was implemented between May 2008 and March 2009, involved training on data collection and feedback for health information personnel and programme managers, monthly data reviews and data audits at health-care facilities. Data on six data elements used to monitor PMTCT services and recorded in the information system were compared with source data from health facility registers before, during and after the intervention. Data completeness (i.e. their presence in the system) and accuracy (i.e. being within 10% of their true value) were evaluated. Findings The level of data completeness increased from 26% before to 64% after the intervention. Similarly, the proportion of data in the information system considered accurate increased from 37% to 65% (P<0.0001). Moreover, the correlation between data in the information system and those from facility registers rose from 0.54 to 0.92. Conclusion A simple, practical data improvement intervention significantly increased the completeness and accuracy of the data used to monitor PMTCT services in South Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available